The election of 2011 was fraudulent, and the only person with the power to revisit it is Stephen Harper.

Month: September, 2014

Thomas Mulcair

On 2014-09-27 7:11 PM, electionfraud2011 wrote:
> The intelligent controlled way that Thomas Mulcair exposed Harper in the 41st Parliament was quite magnificent. Unfortunately, every single indicator says that he, his beard and a performance seldom seen in the Westy, holding a lying, obfuscating, criminal PM’s cloven hooves to the fire with brimstone, will count for not enough, in the face of the handsome young man who dispatched a wife beating CPC with core values of dishonesty and greed and whom I reference as "uncle Tomahawk", in a boxing ring for charity, who has a famous family well respected by all but the fascisticaly inclined, tar sand soaked, and is in fact a much brighter polico a much brighter person mister Trudeau.
> That being the case I’m hoping for a minority. Trudeau would be forced to work with Mr Mulcair. A coalition with Harpy and his fascist CPC party would be political suicide, because out of power Harpy would not be able to shut down investigations that I believe will get him free room, board and lots of new neighbours, angry and incarcerated. That eventuation would get the snowball rolling. Harper says he never drinks alcohol and it’s a good thing because the bars he’s going to be near are to keep evil people like himself out of circulation not to help with chemical relaxation.
> Frankly if I’m wrong about Mulcair I’ll have used up the last bit of faith in our antiquated geared to the 1% system, and I’ll have to change my actions from change of illegal manifestation, i.e. illegal government, to extreme change of system.
> It’s actually not so extreme or radical but rather an honest modern manifestation of what humans want from a system.
> The Westminster system for the 21st century is a classic buggy whip example. The best parallel I can make into this absurd antiquity is the practice of bleeding people as the medical procedure recommended for them. A few didn’t die, so maybe we’re onto something.
> If people below a certain level believe that their lives are improved by the economic disparity that currently exists then they are using non rational and illogical thought to such a degree that it can be said that the person has been propaganda warped. Let me try this example.
> 50-60 years ago when they knew it was an absolutely indefensible untruth, members of the 1% who were the tobacco cartel told you that smoking was good for you, whereas what was really happening was that they, cigarettes, were killing you, and they were spending millions to make billions on media advertising that was wholly false. And wholly deadly to the same public that believe in the political lies with the exact same self destructive end.
> Somehow I think that in a rational world, I’ve just described murder, or at the least manslaughter in the case of tobacco and whatever you would call the political parallel. (Actually it should logically be called "mass-murder". Yet it was 50-60 years before the 1% who owned and directed the business complete with lies, huge profit and huge public health consequences such as death, disfigurement and all the illustrations of tobacco’s toll seen on today’s packages of this product, was even held financially responsible.
> That is essentially the business model of the Harpocracy. Bitumen, continued and accelerated crimes against all First Nations, wars to support various fascist regimes such as Ukraine/Russia, Israel/Palestine and now "all in", in the quagmire engineered by Dubya, Donald and Dick and the next fascist dictator to raise his or her ugly head, and accelerated profit flow to the 1%.
> If you can’t see the absurdity of the MONOPOLY game reality of your space in the 21st century then you’re proving my point about the propagandization of you.
> Our system is unlimited expansion in a finite space. No wonder science is a four letter word in Harpyland.
> I fear that the Westminster Parliamentary system is this century’s GM Corvair and I’m kind of quoting Ralph Nader and saying of the Westy "unsafe at any speed" any time after the 18th century.
> America borrowed from the Iroquois confederacy to form their Euro government. It’s obviously time Euro-Canada spent time talking with First Nations and trying to figure out why there is such huge disparity in generosity and such natural lack of greed. Actually if it wasn’t such an imposition on them the whole world should be asking them. Europe landed on them five hundred years ago and still can’t understand or care about it.
> Thanks most recently to Wabigoon. I feel Ojibwa may be the most spiritual people on the planet. They hide it with generosity.
> And I’m just a boorish Euro who trips over his own lip and attitude.



As much trepidation that I as a voter carried into the 2011 election, I think that now all the ducks are either in a row or at least accounted for.
By accounted for, I mean that, of the reachable electorate, a very large percent now know that beyond question, Jason Kenney, John Baird, Pierre Pollievre, Dean delMastro and most of the other legally elected, scam elected, unelected, former, current and denied of Stephen Joseph Harper’s, inner circle are consummate liars and in his presence, beastly opportunists, or disgustingly cowardly wimps.
The ducks I speak of are Justin Trudeau and the Liberal party. From what I hear from here now, Justin’s words and actions are saying that he’s dragging his party into the 21st purged of much of the 20th century greed and sense of entitlement and at the same time that he’s looking back at and saying, admitting, "yeah, that was us and it sucked."
I believe and I think Justin is concurring with me that honesty even honesty that "the more difficult the better", is the thing that battered and bruised from years of harpyshit, people want.
Getting his party to the post, a better party than it’s past, seems to be important to him. Getting his party and himself to the post in a more moral state than the greedy, energy profit at any cost, "I’m always at the front of any line, notwithstanding being in power I can usually avoid line-ups," CPC. Truly, CPC is ultra greed, scorched earth, hate and racism on the cloven hoof.
Top to bottom the distance CPC’s Harpy and his spineless, mindless mob of sycophant is below Trudeau and his slate of candidates is huge.
The NDP and Mulcair are similarly light-years up the morality ramp from neo-nazi, zion-puppet, fascislut, Stephe who has greased the skids with excreta and has slipped to the bottom of the septic tank.
Justin didn’t learn at the knee of Canada’s infamous ex-pat American pervert, racist, fascist, Thomas Eugene Flanagan, nor been advised by an ancient fraudster like Carson who brings his barely out of her teens, readying a clean water scam on Native people, girlfriend, to PM meetings, or Shelly the ex-cop who had to use fraud to win, and then cost you mega-bucks lying and stonewalling before executing one of CPC’s signature moves. Late, late, late and expensive to you, finally admitting guilt. Ms Glover is the quintessential CPC: consummate liar, fraudster, self righteous fascist and promoted to a minister-ship once she’d proven her CPC core bona fide’s. Willingness, even desire to cheat, to bresk the law. My biggest beef with her is that all the while she’s telling us over and over ad nauseaum that she’s ""Metis"" she’s going along with the racism of the HarperPartyofCanada mob. In a very strange way she is the stereotypical Harpycrit. Low rent, low class, low character and faking it with the cutlery.
Admittedly although my first choice is for a minority coalition and frankly with Mulcair in the major position, second choice the same thing with Justin in the superior position. I’d be "over the moon” with an NDP Mulcair majority victory, merely delighted by a Liberal Trudeau majority victory and devastated by a Harpy and the CPC (Creepy Pervert Corp) victory. Legal or illegal. Perhaps legal would be worse. Harpy stealing the victory is evil, but Canadians actually voting him a victory would be sad.
That a real and honest victory by this collection of liars and fascists could come from the electorate would be personally devastating. But when one sees a youngish woman declare on TV that the thing she likes about Rob Ford "is that he always tells the truth no matter how much that isn’t what you want to hear." What is that. Is it insanity or is it insane denial? This was not an interview at an asylum. This was someone judged capable of being on their own in the big city who is that removed from reality.
To quote John Oliver…
Fellow Canadians: prison not politics is where many CPC belong. Vote them so far out that they can’t steal it and haven’t any power with the courts. Then loudly insist that whoever won, go after them for every single criminal act perpetrated. And go after them seriously not like the farce CPC perpetrated over robocalls and financial fraud.
Yes. The Liberals of yesterday took on a lot of the characteristics of the Mafia…but the Cons of today are in far more ways coincident with the nazis than the Libs were with the Mafia. That scummy little bastard George W. Bush and his crime mob loved war. George wanted, by his own admission, to be known as a war president.
Do you like that little crime spree tantrum he pulled in Iraq. He destabilized the middle-east in a way that it may never recover from, costing millions of lives.
Well in possibly a little less childishly, but certainly no less chillingly evil, a way Harpy also loves war and death and he wants to be the Crime Minister with the greatest amount of blood on his hands. If there’s a wrong side, a more evil, more fascist, more up the wealthy "bitumen barens" kilts, position…well pilgrims Harpy ain’t gettin’ no nose tan.

HI-OH SILVER and Gold and Platinum and Energy and Land and Mineral rights AWAY

The democratic race track

There’s been a wee fact inhabiting the deep recesses of my mind, that’s a firefly. A light at a not ascertainable distance that flickers somewhat and seems to exist in thin air almost more imagined than experienced. It suddenly became clear what was not simply an esoteric intellectual connection but also an important one.
I’ve frequently declared that I love democracy. Well maybe "love" is too strong. That’s more a disingenuous "me thinks thou does protest too much" con style. But I definitely appreciate the concept of joint, majority decision making; of decision that truly benefits the greatest number of people, citizens, neighbours, and that probably also looks after those unable to look after themselves more completely and from a much more equal, much less judgmental stance than any other system.
But we have as undemocratic a system as a system can be and still be called democratic and it’s designed to benefit the few (1%) through very "democratic" process.
How is this possible?
How is it rationally possible that in the entire 20th century an increasing percentage of total wealth flowed upward increasing in percentage of total day after day after day, in a system that supposedly, mathematically, philosophically reflects the will of the majority. If that will is in favour of the obscenity that is the greed, avarice and psychopathology at the top being pandered to then the math just got turned on it’s head.
Look at it this way. Are you in favour of war? Not good war, bad war, our war, their war, religious war, territorial war. Just war. Ordinary garden variety no patriotic stake war. Just war. You know folks killing folks.
Hitler loved it. Harper loves it.
What about education. Does it matter to you that your kid’s tuition went into the stratosphere at the exact same moment as the multi-billionaire’s kids new jet went into the stratosphere.
This is a really goofy way to have a game of monopoly resolve folksingers .
Do you want to see your kids march off to war.
Are you in favour of war or would you like to live in a world that had no war. Because no matter how you answer that question nobody gives a crap. I don’t mean to be insulting, just honest, factual. You my friend are fodder and the only opinion that matters is the 1%. In fact 100% of the 1% including any criminally insane up there account for all the sway, all the skin in the game, every iota of push. They, not you, decide when and who your enemies are. And the decision is most largely based on the bottom line of the top 1%. It’s about their obscenely grotesque, in the face of such willful wanton destruction, and starvation, sumptuous life style.
Example: If you think that the top end is governed by the same set of laws concerning their kids peccadilloes as everyone else you’re living in fantasy. And how about the probability of yours compared to their kids being in a war zone.
In a nutshell. They produce the war and you produce the casualties. The fodder. I’ve never seen a study but it would be interesting to track the economics of war. Such as for every dollar spent by the national treasury how much flows to the 1%’s personal, presumably tax-free offshore accounts.
And as an aside here: Look at that last person in the world who should represent soldiers Julian Fantino doing his little two step on the graves, eviction notices and postponements of their lives of military vets. Democracy?
No. No. No. Democracy should be for the benefit of the many, of the electorate, of the hoi poloi even, but it very very seldom is. It should be a clue that it comes in a box that has the original label taped over and hand marked SHINOLA.
If we had a true democracy which is something almost unimaginable from the depths of our moribund illegal Westminster Parliamentary government which was purloined by a fascist miscreant, logic says that our involvement in wars would definitely take a leftward curve and diminish, the direction of profit flow would reverse and prisons would start to house people from much better neighbourhoods.
I started out with a very different point I wished to make about democracy. Why I somewhat math/scientifically believe in it.
Through the strangest of circumstances, for about five or six years while studying music I was involved in making my living at parimutuel investing. i.e. betting on thoroughbred horse races. It was a good income but became far too time consuming. You live it. I went back to things I could leave and come back to rather than wear all the time. But the one thing that stayed tantalizing in my mind was the profound and repeated examples of the eventual accuracy of the public. The same people that are the electorate, although CPC is trying to change that, are the people who bet on horses. The curious thing that impressed me is that year in and year out horses that are bet to 3:1 meaning 3 losses to 1 win, win a quarter of the time. In other words if we could run this exact race four times the 3:1 horse should win once. And it does.
Averaged over time it absolutely does. The public, punter and electorate is correct in it’s assessment of that race and a jockey, and/or trainer that uses a bat (electric battery) to shock a better performance or any of many drugs for the same purpose, is doing at and to the track, what Tom Flanagan and Stephen Harper found would succeed in the electoral arena. Let’s think of the battery as robocalls and the drugs as financial fraud.
Now let me tell you folks that in this scenario Elections Canada is represented by the track and by the sport. They, the track and the sport and society have nothing to gain and everything to lose from crooked races and crooked elections. The insanity of having a guy with a receipt for batteries sticking out of one pocket and a huge syringe sticking out of the other and a reputation and guilty plea for this kind of activity in the past, as the final arbitrator, is lunacy at it’s craziest.
"What do you think Nigel should I judge myself guilty?"
"Should I let them investigate and throw me in prison?"

Lions and tigers and bears and creepy criminal bastards in Ottawa Oh my.